Jury Video and comments

Thinks to think about moving forward:

– the topic is familiar. People accept it because they relate to it. Everyone is taking selfies. But why are we doing it? It clarifies what we see. Unify people…

– if the project deals with making the image of the architectural object then should i explore how to inhabit the image? (oculus rift, virtual reality…)

– Video needs a climax at the end. At the moment is all even.

– look at how photography increased in value through the art world

– photography was once evidence but now it is no longer accepted because its too easy to manipulate

– the factory is too internal. Explore external relation between factory and context.

– image = translation?

-inhabiting or viewing?

– constructing a reality + reading of the construction of that reality

– photography history / vision – why do we feel the need to portray ourself? and register the world around us?

-is it about the architectural object or the architect?

 

Back to work now…will post later

 

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Jury Video and comments

  1. Sabrina Morreale says:

    I agree on the fact, that until now you took care of the internal part of your factory, and maybe it is time, to discover the factory through a long set of selfies perhaps. Which could describe the external relations between you (the architect), the factory(inside) and the outside. p.s. Did you see us two lovely giggling in the pictures? eheheh

    • Catarina Cruz says:

      i know….i agree as well…just need to figure out how to do it.

      and yes i saw the photos. we should frame them and send to natasha’s house