a few possible ideas

re-con idea 1 – a different point of view

essence of the project
its power to invite spectators to provide a missing piece of the portrayed incomplete reality?
- being viewed as a pure aesthetic product.
- disintegration of the architecture generate the integration of interior and exterior
connection with the architect’s / artist’s state of mind
detached of emotion: there is no awfulness, only melancholy  

–> a new point of view –> a new perspective (that would also put the context into view)

 

 

The spectators:
i.  Soane:  ruin as a stage set to fool / mock people
ii. Charles Dickens:  ruin that moves everyone who look upon it
iii. Hubert Robert:  ruin that later on utilised as other building types.

 

re-con idea 2 – the ruin style

its power to invite spectators to provide a missing piece of the portrayed incomplete reality?
- being viewed as a pure aesthetic product.
- disintegration of the architecture generate the integration of interior and exteriorconnection with the architect’s / artist’s state of mind
detached of emotion: there is no awfulness, only melancholy –> a ruin style (like the Broken Column House) (a very quick sketch: zoom in to see that “the ruin” is actually buildings designed as ruin components)

 

 

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

Comments are closed.